Well, that confirms it. Orlando Bloom IS uncut.

OrlandoUncut

All we needed to know, really.

close

And as we know… if you want your own naked paradise where all the guys are hanging out naked, go to Island House in Key West

IH

53 replies
  1. Heather Moon
    Heather Moon says:

    No. He’s intact. He’s not “uncut” any more than you’re “unbeheaded”. Also, why is anyone surprised? The barbaric practice of cutting babies isn’t practice in the majority of the world.

    Reply
    • disqus_v2yFKlPfST
      disqus_v2yFKlPfST says:

      It’s just an American thing. But not barbaric. That’s ridiculous. Unless it’s their kid, nobody has a right to judge what medical procedures parents choose or don’t choose for their kids.

      Reply
      • lipsy2
        lipsy2 says:

        Circumcision is NOT a parental choice. Just as a parent cannot remove any other healthy body part. Why is male genitalia an American exemption?

        Reply
      • Bryce
        Bryce says:

        Routine circumcision is NOT a “medical procedure”; it’s a surgery that’s done in the absence of a medical necessity. And if parents wanted to cut their baby girl, you wouldn’t be saying that others have no right to judge. People ALWAYS have the right to judge something they view as child abuse. And genital cutting without a medical need is mutilation, barbaric, and abusive. Causing pain without a medical indication, and permanently altering the body of another person without their permission cannot be justified by tradition. That’s not a “choice” that should be made by anyone except the owner of the penis!

        Reply
  2. einnoc22
    einnoc22 says:

    Not “uncut” … He’s natural and normal…like 80% of the men on the planet. His parents weren’t manipulated by an ignorant, greedy, sadistic medical community…

    Reply
    • Max Roberts
      Max Roberts says:

      Most would disagree, a man who has his whole, natural penis feels more sensation, pleasure and I would say, has more fun. You are just conditioned to seeing a surgically altered penis which is not normal.

      Reply
      • MMathews
        MMathews says:

        We will have to agree to disagree. Uncut is not as attractive and sucking cut is much more pleasing. That is the truth.

        Reply
          • Hugh7
            Hugh7 says:

            If your displeasure was about taste or smell, running water makes both equally pleasant to those senses, but a whole one, with its sensitive moving part, is more pleasing.

        • Freedom321
          Freedom321 says:

          It’s no fun sucking when it gives your lover no pleasure. In other words, when he has had his foreskin removed, so his glans have become keratinized and thus cannot feel pleasure sensation anyplace beyond his scar. When a man has his birth penis, his glans are protected and remain soft and highly sensitive to the delicate touch of of the tongue. And if you think your lover still has plenty of feeling, just wait a few years, and the constant rubbing against his underwear will gradually cause him to lose all sensation. Furthermore, the foreskin itself is even more erogenous than the glans, and contains the male g spot. Did you know men can orgasm just from lightly rubbing a particular spot on the inner foreskin, much like females can with their clitoris?

          Reply
          • Freedom321
            Freedom321 says:

            Just wait a few years, without the protection of the foreskin, your glans, in an attempt to create their own protective covering, which was ruthlessly stolen, will become keratinized, or basically, calloused. But you can work on restoration, which, while not able to replace your g spot, and the 20,000 nerve endings, can restore a protective covering, and keep your glans soft and sensitive. It will also make sex more enjoyable for your partner, because it will return the gliding action that your original penis would have had.

            http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com

            http://www.norm.org/lost.html

          • Hugh7
            Hugh7 says:

            “Never had a complaint” is no great compliment. Most women are taught to be tactful to men about their parts.
            “I left him to his singing, hurried home without a pause: Never tell a man the truth about the one that he adores.” – Michael Flanders & Donald Swann, “Armadillo”

    • Hugh7
      Hugh7 says:

      Sure you’re just sayin’ and you’re just wrong. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but all the great Renaissance artists disagreed with you, even putting foreskins back on men who historically would not have had them. And clearly, a moving part is more fun than an static rod.

      Reply
    • Bryce
      Bryce says:

      Disagree. A normal, intact penis is more attractive to me. Not into scars or the dried rubbery look of a cut dick. Plus there’s less there to “play with”, they are thinner, less sensitive, and it’s harder to jerk them off. Foreskin has so many more advantages in terms of functionality and looks.

      Reply
  3. Ouellette
    Ouellette says:

    What a hottie, from head to toe! Ps. Foreskin greatly adds to sexual pleasure for both partners. Sexasnatureintendedit.com

    Reply
      • rwinkel
        rwinkel says:

        We should all be carved into streamlined torsos for maximum efficiency. No need for heads either. Cows don’t need their brains to fulfill their function.

        Reply
      • Cristiano Pereira
        Cristiano Pereira says:

        FUCK. What a hammering of that fuck! Beautiful! Go get them. These burger looking vagina holders don’t say shit when we talk about they fucked up labia that looks like mauled meat. They they whine about a bit of fucking skin.

        Reply
  4. Daniel
    Daniel says:

    You know, there’s nothing wrong with cut or uncut (which by the way is perfect acceptable terminology so get over yourselves)…Uncut penis can get gross and smell and before any of you say you just need to take care of it, let’s be honest and admit that a lot of uncut guys don’t proper maintain themselves. It’s just as wrong for uncut/non-american/etc people to imply there’s something wrong with circumcision as it is for anyone to say that uncut is gross. Both are perfectly fine and acceptable. It is totally up to the individual person dealing with said penis to decide if it’s what they are into. And it IS a parents choice (whatever their reason may be) to decide whether to circumcise their child or not…stop being a bunch of judgmental assholes and just enjoy the nice big penis he has.

    Reply
    • Bryce
      Bryce says:

      No it’s not acceptable terminology. Terminology that is grammatically and biologically incorrect should not be deemed acceptable just because ignorance made it popular. There is no such thing as uncut unless you’re talking about a diamond. People are born intact. Getting cut is something that happens to them, it is not a natural state. And no, circumcision is NOT fine or acceptable unless it was the decision of the owner of the penis. Parents have no right to mutilate their daughters. Likewise they should have no right to mutilate their sons. Their preference is irrelevant to what is morally and ethically correct. Child abuse must always be judged and condemned. And that’s what forced, genital cutting in the absence of a medical need is, ABUSE!

      Reply
    • Jörg Fenske
      Jörg Fenske says:

      who is the bigger judgemental asshole – those you just discuss Law Issues and try to protect Child from harm or those who empower themselfs to make lifelong decission about the body of their child..
      and stop with it is legal. In the third Reich there was alot of fucked up Stuff perfectly legal – still it was wrong and barbaric.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *