Reading Now:Well, that confirms it. Orlando Bloom IS uncut.
Aug 4, 2016
Written by: DickHarden
Celeb • Men • Sports Men
All we needed to know, really.
And as we know… if you want your own naked paradise where all the guys are hanging out naked, go to Island House in Key West…
Last modified: Apr 26, 2017
No. He’s intact. He’s not “uncut” any more than you’re “unbeheaded”. Also, why is anyone surprised? The barbaric practice of cutting babies isn’t practice in the majority of the world.
It’s just an American thing. But not barbaric. That’s ridiculous. Unless it’s their kid, nobody has a right to judge what medical procedures parents choose or don’t choose for their kids.
Circumcision is NOT a parental choice. Just as a parent cannot remove any other healthy body part. Why is male genitalia an American exemption?
Routine circumcision is NOT a “medical procedure”; it’s a surgery that’s done in the absence of a medical necessity. And if parents wanted to cut their baby girl, you wouldn’t be saying that others have no right to judge. People ALWAYS have the right to judge something they view as child abuse. And genital cutting without a medical need is mutilation, barbaric, and abusive. Causing pain without a medical indication, and permanently altering the body of another person without their permission cannot be justified by tradition. That’s not a “choice” that should be made by anyone except the owner of the penis!
Where is this that he can just go buck naked?
Apparently he’s on vacation in Greece or something.
I misread “vacation” as “vatican”…
Could be a lot of places in Olde Europe.
Not “uncut” … He’s natural and normal…like 80% of the men on the planet. His parents weren’t manipulated by an ignorant, greedy, sadistic medical community…
Is that even legal? To not be mutilated I mean. It scares me. I think someone should do something about it.
You’re asking if it’s legal to not have mutilated genitals?
I was joking. Circumisers should be in jail.
The Mutilation Matrix is choking in narcissistic frustration.
Intact is where its at! Smart parents aren’t cutting babies in 2016. http://Www.sexasnatureintendedit.com
Yes! He’s intact!
Dammit he is uncut, yuck….cut cock is way more attractive and fun, just sayin…
Most would disagree, a man who has his whole, natural penis feels more sensation, pleasure and I would say, has more fun. You are just conditioned to seeing a surgically altered penis which is not normal.
We will have to agree to disagree. Uncut is not as attractive and sucking cut is much more pleasing. That is the truth.
You have no idea what your missing… All my favorite lovers were intact.
I know what I’m missing. No pleasure for me whatsoever and sucking that thing is just wierd.
“sucking that thing is just weird.”
Says the uncircumcised woman.
But i bet you like somebody munching on those floppy nasty meat flaps!
A foreskin is the world’s best bimbo repellent!
Pour Champagne in it!
Why don’t you cut off your labia?
Someone should tell your partner/s about running water.
If your displeasure was about taste or smell, running water makes both equally pleasant to those senses, but a whole one, with its sensitive moving part, is more pleasing.
It’s no fun sucking when it gives your lover no pleasure. In other words, when he has had his foreskin removed, so his glans have become keratinized and thus cannot feel pleasure sensation anyplace beyond his scar. When a man has his birth penis, his glans are protected and remain soft and highly sensitive to the delicate touch of of the tongue. And if you think your lover still has plenty of feeling, just wait a few years, and the constant rubbing against his underwear will gradually cause him to lose all sensation. Furthermore, the foreskin itself is even more erogenous than the glans, and contains the male g spot. Did you know men can orgasm just from lightly rubbing a particular spot on the inner foreskin, much like females can with their clitoris?
Never had a complaint so it works as good you say it does, but without foreskin
Just wait a few years, without the protection of the foreskin, your glans, in an attempt to create their own protective covering, which was ruthlessly stolen, will become keratinized, or basically, calloused. But you can work on restoration, which, while not able to replace your g spot, and the 20,000 nerve endings, can restore a protective covering, and keep your glans soft and sensitive. It will also make sex more enjoyable for your partner, because it will return the gliding action that your original penis would have had.
“Never had a complaint” is no great compliment. Most women are taught to be tactful to men about their parts.
“I left him to his singing, hurried home without a pause: Never tell a man the truth about the one that he adores.” – Michael Flanders & Donald Swann, “Armadillo”
what does the Egg know about the Chickens Life?
Sure you’re just sayin’ and you’re just wrong. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but all the great Renaissance artists disagreed with you, even putting foreskins back on men who historically would not have had them. And clearly, a moving part is more fun than an static rod.
Good thing you’re gay. You would absolutely gag on vaginas.
I loves my Ina and her comestible vagina!
Disagree. A normal, intact penis is more attractive to me. Not into scars or the dried rubbery look of a cut dick. Plus there’s less there to “play with”, they are thinner, less sensitive, and it’s harder to jerk them off. Foreskin has so many more advantages in terms of functionality and looks.
He is not “uncut”, he is simply normal.
Too bad I cannot post this for all my health nut readers : ) But think it might be a bit overwhelming for them! : )
Wow, I’m shocked that a BRITISH man has his whole penis. (Not at all, actually.)
He’s all natural <3 I'm in love! Nothing better than an intact, unmutilated member!
What a hottie, from head to toe! Ps. Foreskin greatly adds to sexual pleasure for both partners. Sexasnatureintendedit.com
What a shame…. He should fix it.
Fix what? Most women are uncircumcised too, having all their wrinkly, oftentimes moist folds of skin on their genitals. Should they “fix it” too?
We should all be carved into streamlined torsos for maximum efficiency. No need for heads either. Cows don’t need their brains to fulfill their function.
FUCK. What a hammering of that fuck! Beautiful! Go get them. These burger looking vagina holders don’t say shit when we talk about they fucked up labia that looks like mauled meat. They they whine about a bit of fucking skin.
It doesn’t need to be “fixed” However Cristiano, you sound like quite a douche bag.
He was responding to the lady above who said “he should fix it.” His tirade was altogether fair game.
Your comment is a shame. You should fix your brain!
Well of course he is. He’s British.
You know, there’s nothing wrong with cut or uncut (which by the way is perfect acceptable terminology so get over yourselves)…Uncut penis can get gross and smell and before any of you say you just need to take care of it, let’s be honest and admit that a lot of uncut guys don’t proper maintain themselves. It’s just as wrong for uncut/non-american/etc people to imply there’s something wrong with circumcision as it is for anyone to say that uncut is gross. Both are perfectly fine and acceptable. It is totally up to the individual person dealing with said penis to decide if it’s what they are into. And it IS a parents choice (whatever their reason may be) to decide whether to circumcise their child or not…stop being a bunch of judgmental assholes and just enjoy the nice big penis he has.
No it’s not acceptable terminology. Terminology that is grammatically and biologically incorrect should not be deemed acceptable just because ignorance made it popular. There is no such thing as uncut unless you’re talking about a diamond. People are born intact. Getting cut is something that happens to them, it is not a natural state. And no, circumcision is NOT fine or acceptable unless it was the decision of the owner of the penis. Parents have no right to mutilate their daughters. Likewise they should have no right to mutilate their sons. Their preference is irrelevant to what is morally and ethically correct. Child abuse must always be judged and condemned. And that’s what forced, genital cutting in the absence of a medical need is, ABUSE!
who is the bigger judgemental asshole – those you just discuss Law Issues and try to protect Child from harm or those who empower themselfs to make lifelong decission about the body of their child..
and stop with it is legal. In the third Reich there was alot of fucked up Stuff perfectly legal – still it was wrong and barbaric.